# Prisma Relations and Redwood's Generators

These docs apply to Redwood v0.25 and greater. Previous versions of Redwood had limitations when creating scaffolds for any one-to-many or many-to-many relationships. Most of those have been resolved so you should definitely upgrade to 0.25 if at all possible!

# Many-to-many Relationships

Here are Prisma's docs for creating many-to-many relationships - A many-to-many relationship is accomplished by creating a "join" or "lookup" table between two other tables. For example, if a Product can have many Tags, any given Tag can also have many Products that it is attached to. A database diagram for this relationship could look like:

┌───────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐      ┌───────────┐
│  Product  │     │  ProductsOnTag  │      │    Tag    │
├───────────┤     ├─────────────────┤      ├───────────┤
│ id        │────<│ productId       │   ┌──│ id        │
│ title     │     │ tagId           │>──┘  │ name      │
│ desc      │     └─────────────────┘      └───────────┘

The schema.prisma syntax to create this relationship looks like:

model Product {
  id       Int    @id @default(autoincrement())
  title    String
  desc     String
  tags     Tag[]

model Tag {
  id       Int     @id @default(autoincrement())
  name     String
  products Product[]

These relationships can be implicit (as this diagram shows) or explicit (explained below). Redwood's SDL generator (which is also used by the scaffold generator) only supports an explicit many-to-many relationship when generating with the --crud flag. What's up with that?

# CRUD Requires an @id

CRUD (Create, Retrieve, Update, Delete) actions in Redwood currently require a single, unique field in order to retrieve, update or delete a record. This field must be denoted with Prisma's @id attribute, marking it as the tables's primary key. This field is guaranteed to be unique and so can be used to find a specific record.

Prisma's implicit many-to-many relationships create a table without a single field marked with the @id attribute. Instead, it uses a similar attribute: @@id to define a multi-field ID. This multi-field ID will become the tables's primary key. The diagram above shows the result of letting Prisma create an implicit relationship.

Since there's no single @id field in implicit many-to-many relationships, you can't use the SDL generator with the --crud flag. Likewise, you can't use the scaffold generator, which uses the SDL generator (with --crud) behind the scenes.

# Supported Table Structure

To support both CRUD actions and to remain consistent with Prisma's many-to-many relationships, a combination of the @id and @@unique attributes can be used. With this, @id is used to create a primary key on the lookup-table; and @@unique is used to maintain the table's unique index, which was previously accomplished by the primary key created with @@id.

Removing @@unique would let a specific Product reference a particular Tag more than a single time.

You can get this working by creating an explicit relationship—defining the table structure yourself:

model Product {
  id    Int         @id @default(autoincrement())
  title String
  desc  String
  tags  ProductsOnTag[]

model Tag {
  id       Int      @id @default(autoincrement())
  name     String
  products ProductsOnTag[]

model ProductsOnTag {
  id        Int     @id @default(autoincrement())
  tagId     Int
  tag       Tag     @relation(fields: [tagId], references: [id])
  productId Int
  product   Product @relation(fields: [productId], references: [id])

  @@unique([tagId, productId])

Which creates a table structure like:

┌───────────┐      ┌──────────────────┐     ┌───────────┐
│  Product  │      │  ProductsOnTags  │     │    Tag    │
├───────────┤      ├──────────────────┤     ├───────────┤
│ id        │──┐   │ id               │  ┌──│ id        │
│ title     │  └──<│ productId        │  │  │ name      │
│ desc      │      │ tagId            │>─┘  └───────────┘
└───────────┘      └──────────────────┘

Almost identical! But now there's an id and the SDL/scaffold generators will work as expected. The explicit syntax gives you a couple additional benefits—you can customize the table name and even add more fields. Maybe you want to track which user tagged a product—add a userId column to ProductsOnTags and now you know.